Received: from central.cnet.com (central.cnet.com [204.162.81.10]) by veda.it.uu.se (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f6GJdoq09182 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:39:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: from cnet20.cnet.com (cnet20.cnet.com [204.162.82.33]) by central.cnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA01102 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107161940.MAA01102@central.cnet.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:25:38 GMT+01:00 To: Anders Andersson Subject: Re: CNET_Digital_Dispatch@one.digital.cnet.com (KMM1094913C0KM) From: CNET Newsletter Support Reply-To: CNET Newsletter Support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "us-ascii" X-Mailer: Kana 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by veda.it.uu.se id f6GJdoq09182 Content-Length: 4026 Hello andersa@DoCS.UU.SE, That address will be defaulted to our Admin team who really have nothing to do with user support. It's only going to be filtered back to us in support and we're going to repeat what we've written once again. Regards, CNET Support Services http://home.cnet.com/?tag=st.cn.support.3 *Please include original message in your reply* Original message follows: ------------------------- [I'm copying this to for his information, as I initially contacted him about it, thinking he was involved, and I would like to bring him up to date on the issue. Maybe some other postmasters would be interested in this as well, as this is about processing of delivery error notices in general, not merely an error with one of your e-mail dispatches.] CNET Newsletter Support wrote: >If you are experiencing errors with dispatches please report this to >either this address or bugs@cnet.com. Tell us the dispatch name and if >possible the date and feature you are not able to access. We, like everybody else on the Internet, have an automated procedure to report e-mail delivery problems back to the sender of the message. That procedure is implemented in the Mail Transfer Agent (MTA), in our case Sendmail, and depends on the SMTP envelope sender address being useful for the purpose of sending error messages to it. In order to have our automated procedure send its error messages to some other address, that address must be given in the SMTP envelope. Since April, I have noticed about a dozen error messages sent your way due to your dispatches being sent to undeliverable addresses in our domains. It appears you haven't seen those error messages, which makes me a little disappointed. You are in effect asking me to intervene manually whenever we detect a bad address in your mailing list. The information you ask for is precisely what we send you automatically, only that we send it to , not to any address you spell out in the body text of your dispatches or in your communication with me. Having to do this manually creates a lot more work for us, especially since we can normally expect the automated procedure to work. It's not very practical to have a human operator identify the sender and engage in a technical conversation each time an e-mail message fails to reach its recipient, and I doubt this is the intent behind your setup. With the appearance of spam, triggering hundreds if not thousands of error messages each day, manual handling becomes an impossibility. >The physical act of mailing our dispatches is done by an outside vendor >which accounts for the digital address. They are not able to respond to >any bug or error reports only we at CNET are able to address these. Thank you for clarifying the situation. Does your contract with the outside vendor specify how they should deal with delivery errors pertaining to the e-mail addresses you provide to them? When a recipient address is no longer working, will they inform you about it and ask you to take action, or will they remove the address from the mailing list themselves, perhaps informing you after the fact? Do you provide them with the current mailing list to use for each dispatch, or do they maintain a copy of the mailing list based on incremental updates provided by you? Please don't spend too much time trying to answer every question above; they are mostly rethorical questions meant to clarify the problem I see. If you can solve the problem without further assistance from me, I'd be happy with that. However, I may be able to put you in touch with some experienced Internet users willing to do consulting for a fee, if you believe you could use some outside expertise in this matter. Let me know what you think. Regards, Anders Andersson, Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University Paper Mail: Box 325, S-751 05 UPPSALA, Sweden Phone: +46 18 4713170 EMail: andersa@DoCS.UU.SE