Received: from cn-sfo1-g7.cnet.com (cn-sfo1-g7.cnet.com [204.162.81.23]) by veda.it.uu.se (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f6DMMQq02690 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:22:27 +0200 (MEST) Received: from CNET10.cnet.com (82-250.cnet.com [204.162.82.250]) by cn-sfo1-g7.cnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28773 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cnet10.cnet.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3ZNX33LL>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:22:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3482305AF0F6CF469ED45C0D48FAFCF7094538E4@cnet10.cnet.com> From: Postmaster To: "'Anders Andersson'" Subject: RE: CNET_Digital_Dispatch@one.digital.cnet.com (KMM1087650C0KM) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:22:07 -0700 Return-Receipt-To: Postmaster MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252" Content-Length: 2362 i have passed on your email to the appropriate parties... one.digital.cnet.com is misleading as it is not hosted directly by cnet.com. newsletter-support@cnet.com is incorrect. this is actually an affiliation between zdnet.com and flonetwork.com (zdnet.com is part of the cnet networks family). apologies -postmaster -----Original Message----- From: Anders Andersson [mailto:andersa@DoCS.UU.SE] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:46 PM To: newsletter-support@cnet.com Cc: CNET_Digital_Dispatch@one.digital.cnet.com; postmaster@cnet.com Subject: Re: CNET_Digital_Dispatch@one.digital.cnet.com (KMM1087650C0KM) CNET Newsletter Support wrote: >That's not a valid mailto. What's your error or bug report please? Are you saying that is not a valid e-mail address? If so, why can I send mail to it? 220 uuinc11smtp1.uu.flonetwork.com ESMTP Postfix HELO zork.it.uu.se 250 uuinc11smtp1.uu.flonetwork.com MAIL FROM: 250 Ok RCPT TO: 250 Ok DATA 354 End data with . From: postmaster@DoCS.UU.SE To: CNET_Digital_Dispatch@one.digital.cnet.com Subject: Test This is an e-mail connectivity test. Please confirm receipt. . 250 Ok: queued as 0228B7C02 QUIT 221 Bye No SMTP error, and I have never received a bounced message for that address. It sure looks valid to me... And if it still isn't valid, then how come it sends mail to us? You don't say that you use fake sender addresses on your outbound e-mail, do you? Here is a header excerpt from a timestamped message: Return-Path: Received: from uuout11smtp6.uu.flonetwork.com ([205.150.6.46]:2159 "EHLO uuout11smtp6.uu.flonetwork.com") by emberiza.its.uu.se with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 04:01:58 +0200 The Return-Path line indicates the SMTP envelope sender address, as specified in MAIL FROM. It must be a valid mailbox, or we won't be able to return an error message to the sender if there is a delivery problem. It must not be a null sink that throws away everything sent to it. Regards, Anders Andersson, Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University Paper Mail: Box 325, S-751 05 UPPSALA, Sweden Phone: +46 18 4713170 EMail: andersa@DoCS.UU.SE