UU | IT | DoCS | eh

 

TIC -- Lecture6: Clustered Architectures


1. Who are you?

2. Which of the following statements are true for paper P4 (Canal)?
1 Inter-cluster bypasses are cheaper then local bypasses
2 For good-performing schemes the number of communication buses between clusters is not important
3 Balance is more important then communication latency for the simulated tests
4 Assuming every instruction has its registers allocated in its local cluster the simple RMBS scheme would perform best.
5 According to the authors new steering schemes will be needed in the future (because of higher latencies).
3. Which of the following statements are true for paper P5 (Parcerisa)?
1 In current technology the total latency of a communication is dominated by contention-delay.
2 In a 4-cluster 8-issue system with a partially synchronous ring the average number of copy-instruction executed every cycle is about 0.5if the IPC is 3.
3 In the baseline steering heuristic the second criterion is used more often than it is used in the extended heuristic.
4 When forwarding a message each router in the network chooses the first neighbor it finds that minimizes the path-length.
5 In the 8-Cluster topologies studied in the paper nodes with 4-neighbors require larger buffers than nodes with 3 neighbors.
4. Which of the following statements are true for paper P6 (Tseng)?
1 When going from having only one read and write port/bank to two read and write ports/bank the extra write port adds more to area then the read port (due to its larger decoder area).
2 Only one extra pipeline stage is needed (Arbitrate) but the solution requires extra logic in the issue stage.
3 The number of logical register ports increases quadratically with issue width.
4 Control logic is a crucial issue avoiding bank conflicts therefore it must be designed without adding severe complexity and latency in the pipeline.
5 Bank conflicts can significantly be reduced using both read sharing and the bypass network
5 . Rate paper P5
1 Was it easy to read the paper?
2 Is the paper technically sound (for the time it was written)?
3 How do you rate the overall presentation?
4 Any short suggestions for improvements?

6 . Submit at least two issues to discuss at the meeting
1 Issue 1

2 Issue 2

3 Issue 3

4 Issue 4

Please, print a copy of your form and bring it to the next meeting


<eh@it.uu.se>